2004-07-22 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
+ PR c/7284
+ * fold-const.c (extract_muldiv_1): Do not treat signed left shift
+ as multiplication.
+
+2004-07-22 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
+
* doc/implement-c.texi: New file.
* doc/extend.texi (C Implementation): Move to there.
* doc/gcc.texi: Include implement-c.texi.
case LSHIFT_EXPR: case RSHIFT_EXPR:
/* If the second operand is constant, this is a multiplication
or floor division, by a power of two, so we can treat it that
- way unless the multiplier or divisor overflows. */
+ way unless the multiplier or divisor overflows. Signed
+ left-shift overflow is implementation-defined rather than
+ undefined in C90, so do not convert signed left shift into
+ multiplication. */
if (TREE_CODE (op1) == INTEGER_CST
+ && (tcode == RSHIFT_EXPR || TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
/* const_binop may not detect overflow correctly,
so check for it explicitly here. */
&& TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (size_one_node)) > TREE_INT_CST_LOW (op1)
+2004-07-22 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
+
+ PR c/7284
+ * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr7284-1.c: New test.
+
2004-07-22 Brian Booth <bbooth@redhat.com>
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040721-1.c: New test.
--- /dev/null
+/* Signed left-shift is implementation-defined in C89 (and see
+ DR#081), not undefined. Bug 7284 from Al Grant (AlGrant at
+ myrealbox.com). */
+
+/* { dg-options "-std=c89" } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+extern void exit (int);
+
+int
+f (int n)
+{
+ return (n << 24) / (1 << 23);
+}
+
+volatile int x = 128;
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ if (f(x) != -256)
+ abort ();
+ exit (0);
+}