When using xor to zero a 64-bit register, generate 32-bit instruction instead.
(according to Intel 64-bit mode coding guidelines)
previous code for zeroing RAX:
xor rax, rax
==>
new code for zeroing RAX:
xor eax, eax
The 32-bit operand form has the same semantics: It also zeroes the upper
32-bit of rax and its encoding uses 1 byte less.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/330018
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@3132
ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-
3dcde31c8c00
void testq(Register dst, Immediate mask);
void xor_(Register dst, Register src) {
- arithmetic_op(0x33, dst, src);
+ if (dst.code() == src.code()) {
+ arithmetic_op_32(0x33, dst, src);
+ } else {
+ arithmetic_op(0x33, dst, src);
+ }
}
void xorl(Register dst, Register src) {