+2003-09-07 Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
+
+ PR middle-end/11665
+ * gcc.c-torture/compile/20030907-1.c: New test.
+ * g++.dg/init/array11.C: New test.
+
2003-09-07 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/11852
--- /dev/null
+/* PR 11665
+ Orgin: jwhite@cse.unl.edu
+ The problem was in initializer_constant_valid_p,
+ "for a CONSTRUCTOR, only the last element
+ of the CONSTRUCTOR was being checked"
+ (from the email of the patch which fixed this).
+ This used to ICE because GCC thought gdt_table was a
+ constant value when it is not. */
+
+int x;
+struct gdt
+{
+unsigned a,b,c,d,e,f;
+};
+void f()
+{
+struct gdt gdt_table[2]=
+{
+ {
+ 0,
+ ( (((unsigned)(&x))<<(24))&(-1<<(8)) ),
+ },
+};
+}
+
--- /dev/null
+/* PR 11665
+ Orgin: jwhite@cse.unl.edu
+ The problem was in initializer_constant_valid_p,
+ "for a CONSTRUCTOR, only the last element
+ of the CONSTRUCTOR was being checked"
+ (from the email of the patch which fixed this).
+ This used to ICE because GCC thought gdt_table was a
+ constant value when it is not. */
+
+int x;
+struct gdt
+{
+unsigned a,b,c,d,e,f;
+};
+void f()
+{
+struct gdt gdt_table[2]=
+{
+ {
+ 0,
+ ( (((unsigned)(&x))<<(24))&(-1<<(8)) ),
+ },
+};
+}
+