There's a regression in 4.4-rc since commit
bc3094673f22
(btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum) in that
existing (non-ranged) balance with -dusage=x no longer works; all chunks
are skipped.
After staring at the code for a while and wondering why a non-ranged
balance would even need min and max thresholds (..which then were not
set correctly, leading to the bug) I realized that the only problem
was the fact that the filter functions were named wrong, thanks to
patching copypasta. Simply renaming both functions lets the existing
btrfs-progs call balance with -dusage=x and now the non-ranged filter
function is invoked, properly using only a single chunk limit.
Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Fixes: bc3094673f22 ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
return 1;
}
-static int chunk_usage_filter(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 chunk_offset,
+static int chunk_usage_range_filter(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 chunk_offset,
struct btrfs_balance_args *bargs)
{
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache;
return ret;
}
-static int chunk_usage_range_filter(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+static int chunk_usage_filter(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 chunk_offset, struct btrfs_balance_args *bargs)
{
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache;