This is a simple bug. target_disable_btrace and target_teardown_btrace,

both from gdb/target.c, do a "return" calling another function.  But both
are marked as void.  Despite the fact that the functions being called are
void as well, this is wrong.  This patch fixes this by calling the functions
and then returning in the next line.

2013-10-16  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/16042
	* target.c (target_disable_btrace): Fix invalid return value for
	void function.
	(target_teardown_btrace): Likewise.

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index da2c84d..b2f1fc8 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2013-10-16  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>
+
+       PR gdb/16042
+       * target.c (target_disable_btrace): Fix invalid return value for
+       void function.
+       (target_teardown_btrace): Likewise.
+
 2013-10-14  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>
 
        * varobj.c (struct varobj): Move most of the fields to

diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
index 7279359..22d7fb6 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/target.c
+++ b/gdb/target.c
@@ -4165,7 +4165,10 @@ target_disable_btrace (struct btrace_target_info *btinfo)
 
   for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
     if (t->to_disable_btrace != NULL)
-      return t->to_disable_btrace (btinfo);
+      {
+       t->to_disable_btrace (btinfo);
+       return;
+      }
 
   tcomplain ();
 }
@@ -4179,7 +4182,10 @@ target_teardown_btrace (struct btrace_target_info *btinfo)
 
   for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
     if (t->to_teardown_btrace != NULL)
-      return t->to_teardown_btrace (btinfo);
+      {
+       t->to_teardown_btrace (btinfo);
+       return;
+      }
 
   tcomplain ();
 }