It's hard to keep track of changes to the process docs.
Subsystem maintainers should probably know what's going on,
to ensure reasonably uniform developer experience across
trees.
We also need a place where process discussions can be held
(i.e. designated mailing list which can be CCed on naturally
arising discussions). I'm using workflows@ in this RFC,
but a new list may be better.
No change to the patch flow intended.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230511020204.910178-1-kuba@kernel.org
X: Documentation/spi/
X: Documentation/userspace-api/media/
+DOCUMENTATION PROCESS
+M: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
+S: Maintained
+F: Documentation/process/
+L: workflows@vger.kernel.org
+
DOCUMENTATION REPORTING ISSUES
M: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
L: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org