xfrm: esp6: fix the location of the transport header with encapsulation
authorSabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:03:47 +0000 (16:03 +0200)
committerSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Tue, 28 Jul 2020 05:57:23 +0000 (07:57 +0200)
commit 17175d1a27c6 ("xfrm: esp6: fix encapsulation header offset
computation") changed esp6_input_done2 to correctly find the size of
the IPv6 header that precedes the TCP/UDP encapsulation header, but
didn't adjust the final call to skb_set_transport_header, which I
assumed was correct in using skb_network_header_len.

Xiumei Mu reported that when we create xfrm states that include port
numbers in the selector, traffic from the user sockets is dropped. It
turns out that we get a state mismatch in __xfrm_policy_check, because
we end up trying to compare the encapsulation header's ports with the
selector that's based on user traffic ports.

Fixes: 0146dca70b87 ("xfrm: add support for UDPv6 encapsulation of ESP")
Fixes: 26333c37fc28 ("xfrm: add IPv6 support for espintcp")
Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
net/ipv6/esp6.c

index 55ae70be91b3c49d9663da3501cf71bd9b9b84f0..52c2f063529fbf9e33326eb6d3887f8c810b26eb 100644 (file)
@@ -815,6 +815,7 @@ int esp6_input_done2(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
                offset = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, offset, &nexthdr, &frag_off);
                uh = (void *)(skb->data + offset);
                th = (void *)(skb->data + offset);
+               hdr_len += offset;
 
                switch (x->encap->encap_type) {
                case TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP: