[ Upstream commit
a82c7cf803d98751cd3ddb35828faad925d71982 ]
Clang complains that devm_add_action() takes a parameter with a wrong type:
warning: cast from 'void (*)(struct mutex *)' to 'void (*)(void *)' converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict]
err = devm_add_action(dev, (void (*)(void *))mutex_destroy, &is31->lock);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
It appears that the commit
e1af5c815586 ("leds: is31fl319x: Fix devm vs.
non-devm ordering") missed two things:
- whilst the commit mentions devm_add_action_or_reset() the actual change
utilised devm_add_action() call by mistake
- strictly speaking the parameter is not compatible by type
Fix both issues by switching to devm_add_action_or_reset() and adding a
wrapper for mutex_destroy() call.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes:
e1af5c815586 ("leds: is31fl319x: Fix devm vs. non-devm ordering")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@mailoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221228093238.82713-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
return dezibel / IS31FL3196_AUDIO_GAIN_DB_STEP;
}
+static void is31f1319x_mutex_destroy(void *lock)
+{
+ mutex_destroy(lock);
+}
+
static int is31fl319x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct is31fl319x_chip *is31;
return -ENOMEM;
mutex_init(&is31->lock);
- err = devm_add_action(dev, (void (*)(void *))mutex_destroy, &is31->lock);
+ err = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, is31f1319x_mutex_destroy, &is31->lock);
if (err)
return err;