RDMA/cma: Simplify DEVICE_REMOVAL for internal_id
authorJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Thu, 23 Jul 2020 07:07:04 +0000 (10:07 +0300)
committerJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:10:01 +0000 (14:10 -0300)
cma_process_remove() triggers an unconditional rdma_destroy_id() for
internal_id's and skips the event deliver and transition through
RDMA_CM_DEVICE_REMOVAL.

This is confusing and unnecessary. internal_id always has
cma_listen_handler() as the handler, have it catch the
RDMA_CM_DEVICE_REMOVAL event and directly consume it and signal removal.

This way the FSM sequence never skips the DEVICE_REMOVAL case and the
logic in this hard to test area is simplified.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200723070707.1771101-2-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c

index 3d7cc9f..77743ce 100644 (file)
@@ -2478,6 +2478,10 @@ static int cma_listen_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *id,
 {
        struct rdma_id_private *id_priv = id->context;
 
+       /* Listening IDs are always destroyed on removal */
+       if (event->event == RDMA_CM_EVENT_DEVICE_REMOVAL)
+               return -1;
+
        id->context = id_priv->id.context;
        id->event_handler = id_priv->id.event_handler;
        trace_cm_event_handler(id_priv, event);
@@ -4811,7 +4815,7 @@ static void cma_process_remove(struct cma_device *cma_dev)
                cma_id_get(id_priv);
                mutex_unlock(&lock);
 
-               ret = id_priv->internal_id ? 1 : cma_remove_id_dev(id_priv);
+               ret = cma_remove_id_dev(id_priv);
                cma_id_put(id_priv);
                if (ret)
                        rdma_destroy_id(&id_priv->id);