[fortran] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind [PR93580]

Caused by using invalid part_refs in kind specifications,
e.g. %re or %im on non-complex expressions and %len on
non character expressions.

Check whether %re, %im and %len are valid when checking
kind specification.

The original patch from Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org> only
checked for %re and %im.

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/93580
	* primary.c (gfc_match_varspec): If the symbol following %
	is re or im and the primary expression type is not BT_COMPLEX
	issue an error. If the symbol is len and the primary
	expression type is not BT_CHARACTER is an error.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR fortran/93580
	* gfortran.dg/dg/pr93580.f90: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
index a2f45d2..302af3a 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2020-02-18  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
+           Mark Eggleston  <markeggleston@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+       PR fortran/93580
+       * primary.c (gfc_match_varspec): If the symbol following %
+       is re or im and the primary expression type is not BT_COMPLEX
+       issue an error. If the symbol is len and the primary
+       expression type is not BT_CHARACTER is an error.
+
 2020-02-10  Andrew Benson  <abensonca@gmail.com>
 
         PR fortran/83113

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/primary.c b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
index bd50827..d738984 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/fortran/primary.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
@@ -2241,8 +2241,28 @@ gfc_match_varspec (gfc_expr *primary, int equiv_flag, bool sub_flag,
          if (inquiry)
            sym = NULL;
 
-         if (sep == '%' && primary->ts.type != BT_UNKNOWN)
-           intrinsic = true;
+         if (sep == '%')
+           {
+             if (tmp)
+               {
+                 if ((tmp->u.i == INQUIRY_RE || tmp->u.i == INQUIRY_IM)
+                     && primary->ts.type != BT_COMPLEX)
+                   {
+                       gfc_error ("The RE or IM part_ref at %C must be "
+                                  "applied to a COMPLEX expression");
+                       return MATCH_ERROR;
+                   }
+                 else if (tmp->u.i == INQUIRY_LEN
+                          && primary->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER)
+                   {
+                       gfc_error ("The LEN part_ref at %C must be applied "
+                                  "to a CHARACTER expression");
+                       return MATCH_ERROR;
+                   }
+               }
+             if (primary->ts.type != BT_UNKNOWN)
+               intrinsic = true;
+           }
        }
       else
        inquiry = false;

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 8f2c5b0..1c7f879 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2020-02-20  Mark Eggleston <markeggleston@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+       PR fortran/93580
+       * gfortran.dg/dg/pr93580.f90: New test.
+
 2020-02-18  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
 
        PR tree-optimization/93780

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93580.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93580.f90
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4feaa11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93580.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/93580
+
+program p
+   integer, parameter :: n = 4
+   complex(n%re) :: x    ! { dg-error "The RE or IM part_ref at" }
+   complex(n%im) :: y    ! { dg-error "The RE or IM part_ref at" }
+   complex(n%len) :: z   ! { dg-error "The LEN part_ref at" }
+   character(n%im) :: a  ! { dg-error "The RE or IM part_ref at" }
+   character(n%re) :: b  ! { dg-error "The RE or IM part_ref at" }
+   character(n%len) :: c ! { dg-error "The LEN part_ref at" }
+end
+