Commit
37962a331c77 ("bpf: Improve expanding logic in LowerSELECT_CC")
intended to improve code quality for certain jmp conditions. The
commit, however, has a couple of issues:
(1). In code, just swap is not enough, ConditionalCode CC
should also be swapped, otherwise incorrect code will
be generated.
(2). The ConditionalCode swap should be subject to
getHasJmpExt(). If getHasJmpExt() is False, certain
conditional codes will not be supported and swap
may generate incorrect code.
The original goal for this patch is to optimize jmp operations
which does not have JmpExt turned on. If JmpExt is on,
better code could be generated. For example, the test
select_ri.ll is introduced to demonstrate the optimization.
The same result can be achieved with -mcpu=v2 flag.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
llvm-svn: 329043
NegateCC(LHS, RHS, CC);
SDValue TargetCC = DAG.getConstant(CC, DL, LHS.getValueType());
-
SDVTList VTs = DAG.getVTList(Op.getValueType(), MVT::Glue);
-
- // The constant is expected at RHS in Select_Ri pattern.
- if (isa<ConstantSDNode>(LHS.getNode()))
- std::swap(LHS, RHS);
-
SDValue Ops[] = {LHS, RHS, TargetCC, TrueV, FalseV};
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
-; RUN: llc -O2 -march=bpfel -mattr=+alu32 < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -O2 -march=bpfel -mcpu=v2 -mattr=+alu32 < %s | FileCheck %s
;
; long long select_u(unsigned a, unsigned b, long long c, long long d)
; {
%a.b = select i1 %1, i8 %a, i8 %b
ret i8 %a.b
; CHECK-LABEL:minu:
-; CHECK: if r{{[0-9]+}} {{<|>}} 100
+; CHECK: if r{{[0-9]+}} {{<|>}} r{{[0-9]+}}
}
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone uwtable
-; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpf -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=bpf -mcpu=v2 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s
;
; Source file:
; int b, c;