files that was not done from the local system would go unnoticed.
[bug introduced in coreutils-7.5]
+ tail -F (inotify-enabled) would abort when a tailed file is repeated
+ renamed-aside and then recreated.
+ [bug introduced in coreutils-7.5]
+
+ tail -F (inotify-enabled) could fail to follow renamed files.
+ E.g., given a "tail -F a b" process, running "mv a b" would
+ make tail stop tracking additions to "b".
+ [bug introduced in coreutils-7.5]
+
touch -a once again guarantees that a file's change time is
adjusted, working around a bug in current Linux kernels.
[bug introduced in coreutils-8.1]