Instructions might use definition register as its "undef" operand. It
happens on architectures with predicated executon:
```
%0:subreg = instruction op_1, ..., op_N, undef %0:subreg, op_N+2, ...
```
RegisterCoalescer should take into account all remat instruction
operands during destination subregister fixup.
```
; remat result before fix:
%1 = instruction op_1, ..., op_N, undef %1:subreg, op_N+2, ...
; remat result after fix (correct):
%1 = instruction op_1, ..., op_N, undef %1, op_N+2, ...
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125657
TRI->getCommonSubClass(DefRC, DstRC);
if (CommonRC != nullptr) {
NewRC = CommonRC;
+
+ // Instruction might contain "undef %0:subreg" as use operand:
+ // %0:subreg = instr op_1, ..., op_N, undef %0:subreg, op_N+2, ...
+ //
+ // Need to check all operands.
+ for (MachineOperand &MO : NewMI.operands()) {
+ if (MO.isReg() && MO.getReg() == DstReg && MO.getSubReg() == DstIdx) {
+ MO.setSubReg(0);
+ }
+ }
+
DstIdx = 0;
- DefMO.setSubReg(0);
DefMO.setIsUndef(false); // Only subregs can have def+undef.
}
}