Change the MN10300 fault handler to make it check in_atomic() rather than
in_interrupt() as commit
6edaf68a87d17570790fd55f0c451a29ec1d6703 did for other
architectures:
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Wed Dec 6 20:32:18 2006 -0800
[PATCH] mm: arch do_page_fault() vs in_atomic()
In light of the recent pagefault and filemap_copy_from_user work I've
gone through all the arch pagefault handlers to make sure the
inc_preempt_count() 'feature' works as expected.
Several sections of code (including the new filemap_copy_from_user)
rely on the fact that faults do not take locks under increased preempt
count.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* If we're in an interrupt or have no user
* context, we must not take the fault..
*/
- if (in_interrupt() || !mm)
+ if (in_atomic() || !mm)
goto no_context;
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);