zfcp_erp_strategy_check_fsfreq() checks if it is safe to access the
fsf_req associated with the erp_action that gets passed. To test if
it is safe it accesses the fsf_req in order to get its index into
the hash list. This is broken since the fsf_req might be freed already
and the read index has no meaning. It could lead to memory corruption.
Fix this by introducing a new zfcp_reqlist_find_safe() method which
just checks if addresses are equal. This is slower, but only gets
called in case of error recovery.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
return NULL;
}
+static inline struct zfcp_fsf_req *
+zfcp_reqlist_find_safe(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
+{
+ struct zfcp_fsf_req *request;
+ unsigned int idx;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < REQUEST_LIST_SIZE; idx++) {
+ list_for_each_entry(request, &adapter->req_list[idx], list)
+ if (request == req)
+ return request;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/*
* functions needed for reference/usage counting
*/
if (erp_action->fsf_req) {
/* take lock to ensure that request is not deleted meanwhile */
spin_lock(&adapter->req_list_lock);
- if (zfcp_reqlist_find(adapter, erp_action->fsf_req->req_id)) {
+ if (zfcp_reqlist_find_safe(adapter, erp_action->fsf_req) &&
+ erp_action->fsf_req->erp_action == erp_action) {
/* fsf_req still exists */
debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 3, "a_ca_req");
debug_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 3, &erp_action->fsf_req,