Define the EnCFG_BBType_MASK bit as an OR operation between two previous
defines instead of using the OR between two new BIT macros. Thus, the
code is more clear.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Deslandes <quentin.deslandes@itdev.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200402170103.22520-1-oscar.carter@gmx.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
#define EnCFG_BBType_a 0x00
#define EnCFG_BBType_b BIT(0)
#define EnCFG_BBType_g BIT(1)
-#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK (BIT(0) | BIT(1))
+#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK (EnCFG_BBType_b | EnCFG_BBType_g)
#define EnCFG_ProtectMd BIT(5)
/* Bits in the EnhanceCFG_1 register */