[mips] Do not allow -opt-bisect-limit to skip the PIC call optimization pass.

r282428 added the MipsOptimizePICCall as an opt-in pass that can be
skipped when using the -opt-bisect-limit option. However, this pass is
needed because it generates code that conforms to the o32 ABI
specification by using the $t9 register for PIC calls with JALR
instructions.

This bug was exposed by the fact that skipFunction() also checks for
the "optnone" attribute. This caused functions with that attribute to
break the requirements of the o32 ABI.

llvm-svn: 285305

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/Mips/MipsOptimizePICCall.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/Mips/MipsOptimizePICCall.cpp
index 441a2db..f33857f 100644 (file)
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/Mips/MipsOptimizePICCall.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/Mips/MipsOptimizePICCall.cpp
@@ -174,9 +174,6 @@ void MBBInfo::postVisit() {
 
 // OptimizePICCall methods.
 bool OptimizePICCall::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &F) {
-  if (skipFunction(*F.getFunction()))
-    return false;
-
   if (static_cast<const MipsSubtarget &>(F.getSubtarget()).inMips16Mode())
     return false;
 

diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/call-optimization.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/call-optimization.ll
index 762b00e..0be5ff2 100644 (file)
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/call-optimization.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/call-optimization.ll
@@ -89,3 +89,17 @@ entry:
 }
 
 declare double @ceil(double)
+
+; Make sure that the MipsOptimizePICCall pass is run even for optnone functions,
+; as we have to make sure that jalr uses $t9 for PIC code in order to adhere to
+; the MIPS o32 ABI.
+define hidden double @foo(double %dbl) #0 {
+entry:
+  ; O32:      jalr $25
+  %res = call double @sqrt(double %dbl)
+  ret double %res
+}
+
+declare double @sqrt(double)
+
+attributes #0 = { noinline optnone }