return -ENODEV;
}
-/* Here we spill over 80 columns. It is intentional.
- */
-static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child)
+static int sas_check_fanout_expander_topo(struct domain_device *child,
+ struct ex_phy *parent_phy)
{
struct expander_device *child_ex = &child->ex_dev;
+ struct ex_phy *child_phy;
+
+ child_phy = &child_ex->ex_phy[parent_phy->attached_phy_id];
+
+ if (parent_phy->routing_attr == TABLE_ROUTING &&
+ child_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING)
+ return 0;
+
+ sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy);
+
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child)
+{
struct expander_device *parent_ex;
int i;
int res = 0;
for (i = 0; i < parent_ex->num_phys; i++) {
struct ex_phy *parent_phy = &parent_ex->ex_phy[i];
- struct ex_phy *child_phy;
if (parent_phy->phy_state == PHY_VACANT ||
parent_phy->phy_state == PHY_NOT_PRESENT)
if (!sas_phy_match_dev_addr(child, parent_phy))
continue;
- child_phy = &child_ex->ex_phy[parent_phy->attached_phy_id];
-
switch (child->parent->dev_type) {
case SAS_EDGE_EXPANDER_DEVICE:
if (sas_check_edge_expander_topo(child, parent_phy))
res = -ENODEV;
break;
case SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE:
- if (parent_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING ||
- child_phy->routing_attr != SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) {
- sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy);
+ if (sas_check_fanout_expander_topo(child, parent_phy))
res = -ENODEV;
- }
break;
default:
break;