Previously the following code would warn on the use of "T":
template <typename T>
struct X {
typedef T *type;
};
...because nullability is /allowed/ on template parameters (because
they could be pointers). (Actually putting nullability on this use of
'T' will of course break if the argument is a non-pointer type.)
This fix doesn't handle the case where a template parameter is used
/outside/ of a typedef. That seems trickier, especially in parameter
position.
llvm-svn: 285856
// inner pointers.
complainAboutMissingNullability = CAMN_InnerPointers;
- if (T->canHaveNullability() && !T->getNullability(S.Context)) {
+ auto isDependentNonPointerType = [](QualType T) -> bool {
+ // Note: This is intended to be the same check as Type::canHaveNullability
+ // except with all of the ambiguous cases being treated as 'false' rather
+ // than 'true'.
+ return T->isDependentType() && !T->isAnyPointerType() &&
+ !T->isBlockPointerType() && !T->isMemberPointerType();
+ };
+
+ if (T->canHaveNullability() && !T->getNullability(S.Context) &&
+ !isDependentNonPointerType(T)) {
+ // Note that we allow but don't require nullability on dependent types.
++NumPointersRemaining;
}
int X:: *memptr; // expected-warning{{member pointer is missing a nullability type specifier}}
};
+template <typename T>
+struct Typedefs {
+ typedef T *Base; // no-warning
+ typedef Base *type; // expected-warning{{pointer is missing a nullability type specifier}}
+};
+
+Typedefs<int> xx;
+Typedefs<void *> yy;