mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()

The driver depends on ACPI (via MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT), ACPI_PTR() resolution
is always the same. Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning.

That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or
none should be used in a driver.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628221747.33956-7-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
index 7c3ce44..f79ae0d 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static struct platform_driver bxtwc_driver = {
        .driver = {
                .name   = "BXTWC PMIC",
                .pm     = pm_sleep_ptr(&bxtwc_pm_ops),
-               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(bxtwc_acpi_ids),
+               .acpi_match_table = bxtwc_acpi_ids,
                .dev_groups = bxtwc_groups,
        },
 };