bpf: Remove useless else if
authorJiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:16:18 +0000 (10:16 +0800)
committerMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:04:07 +0000 (14:04 -0700)
The assignment of the else and else if branches is the same, so the else
if here is redundant, so we remove it and add a comment to make the code
here readable.

./kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:81:6-8: WARNING: possible condition with no effect (if == else).

Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=2016
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831021618.86770-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c

index c69bce2..0d200a9 100644 (file)
@@ -78,9 +78,7 @@ static void *cgroup_iter_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
                return css_next_descendant_pre(NULL, p->start_css);
        else if (p->order == BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST)
                return css_next_descendant_post(NULL, p->start_css);
-       else if (p->order == BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP)
-               return p->start_css;
-       else /* BPF_CGROUP_ITER_SELF_ONLY */
+       else /* BPF_CGROUP_ITER_SELF_ONLY and BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP */
                return p->start_css;
 }