cpufreq: Fix serialization of frequency transitions
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:06:28 +0000 (16:36 +0530)
committerChanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 02:47:23 +0000 (11:47 +0900)
Commit 7c30ed ("cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized")
interacts poorly with systems that have a single core freqency for all
cores.  On such systems we have a single policy for all cores with
several CPUs.  When we do a frequency transition the governor calls the
pre and post change notifiers which causes cpufreq_notify_transition()
per CPU.  Since the policy is the same for all of them all CPUs after
the first and the warnings added are generated by checking a per-policy
flag the warnings will be triggered for all cores after the first.

Fix this by allowing notifier to be called for n times. Where n is the number of
cpus in policy->cpus.

Change-Id: I5712dde7f992644f9c3ddc8313151f80bea0d877
Reported-and-tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
include/linux/cpufreq.h

index 0426ce8..ca987fa 100644 (file)
@@ -266,11 +266,12 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
        switch (state) {
 
        case CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE:
-               if (WARN(policy->transition_ongoing,
+               if (WARN(policy->transition_ongoing ==
+                                       cpumask_weight(policy->cpus),
                                "In middle of another frequency transition\n"))
                        return;
 
-               policy->transition_ongoing = true;
+               policy->transition_ongoing++;
 
                /* detect if the driver reported a value as "old frequency"
                 * which is not equal to what the cpufreq core thinks is
@@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                "No frequency transition in progress\n"))
                        return;
 
-               policy->transition_ongoing = false;
+               policy->transition_ongoing--;
 
                adjust_jiffies(CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs);
                pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu", (unsigned long)freqs->new,
index e3da73b..bd1ad37 100644 (file)
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
        struct list_head        policy_list;
        struct kobject          kobj;
        struct completion       kobj_unregister;
-       bool                    transition_ongoing; /* Tracks transition status */
+       int                     transition_ongoing; /* Tracks transition status */
 };
 
 #define CPUFREQ_ADJUST                 (0)