[JumpThreading] Fix some strange formatting of code inside LLVM_DEBUG. NFC
authorCraig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com>
Thu, 31 May 2018 18:08:11 +0000 (18:08 +0000)
committerCraig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com>
Thu, 31 May 2018 18:08:11 +0000 (18:08 +0000)
I don't know if clang-format got confused here or what.

llvm-svn: 333675

llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp

index cf9919e..09a7f99 100644 (file)
@@ -1576,11 +1576,11 @@ bool JumpThreadingPass::ProcessThreadableEdges(Value *Cond, BasicBlock *BB,
   assert(!PredValues.empty() &&
          "ComputeValueKnownInPredecessors returned true with no values");
 
-  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "IN BB: " << *BB; for (const auto &PredValue
-                                              : PredValues) {
-    dbgs() << "  BB '" << BB->getName()
-           << "': FOUND condition = " << *PredValue.first << " for pred '"
-           << PredValue.second->getName() << "'.\n";
+  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "IN BB: " << *BB;
+             for (const auto &PredValue : PredValues) {
+               dbgs() << "  BB '" << BB->getName()
+                      << "': FOUND condition = " << *PredValue.first
+                      << " for pred '" << PredValue.second->getName() << "'.\n";
   });
 
   // Decide what we want to thread through.  Convert our list of known values to