pwm: stm32-lp: Add check in case requested period cannot be achieved
authorFabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:54:21 +0000 (16:54 +0200)
committerThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Sat, 21 Sep 2019 01:25:10 +0000 (03:25 +0200)
LPTimer can use a 32KHz clock for counting. It depends on clock tree
configuration. In such a case, PWM output frequency range is limited.
Although unlikely, nothing prevents user from requesting a PWM frequency
above counting clock (32KHz for instance):
- This causes (prd - 1) = 0xffff to be written in ARR register later in
the apply() routine.
This results in badly configured PWM period (and also duty_cycle).
Add a check to report an error is such a case.

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c

index 21cb260..67fca62 100644 (file)
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
        /* Calculate the period and prescaler value */
        div = (unsigned long long)clk_get_rate(priv->clk) * state->period;
        do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+       if (!div) {
+               /* Clock is too slow to achieve requested period. */
+               dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %u ns\n",  state->period);
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
        prd = div;
        while (div > STM32_LPTIM_MAX_ARR) {
                presc++;