ARM: at91: fix ramc standby function registration

After the for_each_matching_node loop, we end up with a null value for np. Then,
of_match_node() is not matching anything and we can't register the standby
function and "ramc no standby function available" is printed.

Fix that by selecting the first available standby function. For now,
at91_pm_set_standby doesn't support multiple different standby functions and no
existing SoCs have different RAM controllers.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
index 28ae63b..d2cade2 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
@@ -343,25 +343,28 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
        struct device_node *np;
        const struct of_device_id *of_id;
        int idx = 0;
+       const void *standby = NULL;
 
-       for_each_matching_node(np, ramc_ids) {
+       for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, ramc_ids, &of_id) {
                at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0);
                if (!at91_ramc_base[idx])
                        panic(pr_fmt("unable to map ramc[%d] cpu registers\n"), idx);
 
+               if (!standby)
+                       standby = of_id->data;
+
                idx++;
        }
 
        if (!idx)
                panic(pr_fmt("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n"));
 
-       of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
-       if (!of_id) {
+       if (!standby) {
                pr_warn("ramc no standby function available\n");
                return;
        }
 
-       at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
+       at91_pm_set_standby(standby);
 }
 
 void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)