[perl #17819] Typo in perltooc?

From: Bob Wilkinson (via RT) <perlbug@perl.org>
Date: 9 Oct 2002 09:50:40 -0000
Message-Id: <rt-17819-39445.14.7484532089852@bugs6.perl.org>

Subject: [perl #17821] Typo in perltooc
From: Bob Wilkinson (via RT) <perlbug@perl.org>
Date: 9 Oct 2002 10:12:51 -0000
Message-Id: <rt-17821-39458.9.41452851965508@bugs6.perl.org>

p4raw-id: //depot/perl@17995

diff --git a/pod/perltooc.pod b/pod/perltooc.pod
index fdddb02..667f9fc 100644 (file)
--- a/pod/perltooc.pod
+++ b/pod/perltooc.pod
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ The astonishing thing about the Cosmos class above is that the value
 returned by the &bigbang "constructor" is not a reference to a blessed
 object at all.  It's just the class's own name.  A class name is, for
 virtually all intents and purposes, a perfectly acceptable object.
-It has state, behavior, and identify, the three crucial components
+It has state, behavior, and identity, the three crucial components
 of an object system.  It even manifests inheritance, polymorphism,
 and encapsulation.  And what more can you ask of an object?
 
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ that happens to be named &spawn.
     print $obj3->color();      # prints "vermilion"
 
 Each of these objects' colors is now "vermilion", because that's the
-meta-object's value that attribute, and these objects do not have
+meta-object's value for that attribute, and these objects do not have
 individual color values set.
 
 Changing the attribute on one object has no effect on other objects