GCC 4.2.1 complains about first_l_name may be used uninitialized, and my brain
agrees.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* solib-svr4.c (svr4_read_so_list): Initialize first_l_name to 0.
2014-02-27 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
+ * solib-svr4.c (svr4_read_so_list): Initialize first_l_name to 0.
+
+2014-02-27 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
+
* sparc-nat.c (sparc_xfer_wcookie): Always use process ID.
2014-02-27 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
svr4_read_so_list (CORE_ADDR lm, CORE_ADDR prev_lm,
struct so_list ***link_ptr_ptr, int ignore_first)
{
- CORE_ADDR first_l_name;
+ CORE_ADDR first_l_name = 0;
CORE_ADDR next_lm;
for (; lm != 0; prev_lm = lm, lm = next_lm)