The second if statement should consider the original al register value,
and not the new one.
Signed-off-by: Boris Figovsky <boris.figovksy@ravellosystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
void helper_daa(void)
{
- int al, af, cf;
+ int old_al, al, af, cf;
int eflags;
eflags = helper_cc_compute_all(CC_OP);
cf = eflags & CC_C;
af = eflags & CC_A;
- al = EAX & 0xff;
+ old_al = al = EAX & 0xff;
eflags = 0;
if (((al & 0x0f) > 9 ) || af) {
al = (al + 6) & 0xff;
eflags |= CC_A;
}
- if ((al > 0x9f) || cf) {
+ if ((old_al > 0x99) || cf) {
al = (al + 0x60) & 0xff;
eflags |= CC_C;
}