We are currently assuming that regcache->ptid is equal to inferior_ptid
when we call target_fetch/store_registers. These asserts just validate
that assumption. Also, since the following patches will change target
code to use regcache->ptid instead of inferior_ptid, asserting that they
are the same should ensure that our changes don't have any unintended
consequences.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* target.c (target_fetch_registers, target_store_registers): Add
assert.
2017-03-13 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
+ * target.c (target_fetch_registers, target_store_registers): Add
+ assert.
+
+2017-03-13 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
+
* regcache.h (regcache_get_ptid): New function.
* regcache.c (regcache_get_ptid): New function.
void
target_fetch_registers (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
{
+ gdb_assert (ptid_equal (regcache_get_ptid (regcache), inferior_ptid));
+
current_target.to_fetch_registers (¤t_target, regcache, regno);
if (targetdebug)
debug_print_register ("target_fetch_registers", regcache, regno);
if (!may_write_registers)
error (_("Writing to registers is not allowed (regno %d)"), regno);
+ gdb_assert (ptid_equal (regcache_get_ptid (regcache), inferior_ptid));
+
current_target.to_store_registers (¤t_target, regcache, regno);
if (targetdebug)
{