This reverts commit
b3cabea3c9153fd42fe5cb851ac58b51ea2b32b8.
Kernel test robot reports -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec
test case [1], which is caused by commit
f95bdb700bc6 ("mm: vmscan: make
global slab shrink lockless"). The root cause is that SRCU has to be careful
to not frequently check for SRCU read-side critical section exits. Therefore,
even if no one is currently in the SRCU read-side critical section,
synchronize_srcu() cannot return quickly. That's why unregister_shrinker()
has become slower.
We will try to use the refcount+RCU method [2] proposed by Dave Chinner
to continue to re-implement the lockless slab shrink. Because there will
be other readers after reverting the shrinker_srcu related changes, so
it is better to restore to hold read lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred.
[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
202305230837.
db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@dread.disaster.area/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230609081518.3039120-4-qi.zheng@linux.dev
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/
202305230837.
db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent = root_mem_cgroup;
/* Prevent from concurrent shrinker_info expand */
- down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ down_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
for_each_node(nid) {
child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]);
}
}
- up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
}
static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)