It is possible (verified on a running system) that frames are processed
by igc_tx_launchtime with a txtime before the start of the cycle
(baset_est).
However, the result of txtime - baset_est is written into a u32,
leading to a wrap around to a positive number. The following
launchtime > 0 check will only branch to executing launchtime = 0
if launchtime is already 0.
Fix it by using a s32 before checking launchtime > 0.
Fixes: db0b124f02ba ("igc: Enhance Qbv scheduling by using first flag bit")
Signed-off-by: Florian Kauer <florian.kauer@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
ktime_t base_time = adapter->base_time;
ktime_t now = ktime_get_clocktai();
ktime_t baset_est, end_of_cycle;
- u32 launchtime;
+ s32 launchtime;
s64 n;
n = div64_s64(ktime_sub_ns(now, base_time), cycle_time);