Here we're crashing because cp_fold_function walks into the (templated)
requirements of a requires-expression outside a template, but the
folding routines aren't prepared to handle templated trees. This patch
fixes this by making cp_fold use evaluate_requires_expr to fold a
requires-expression as a whole, which also means we no longer need to
explicitly do so during gimplification. (Note that we delay folding
of such requires-expressions for sake of better diagnostics when one is
used as the condition of a failed static_assert.)
PR c++/101182
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constraint.cc (evaluate_requires_expr): Adjust function comment.
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: Move to ...
(cp_fold) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: ... here.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires25.C: New test.
}
/* Evaluate the requires-expression T, returning either boolean_true_node
- or boolean_false_node. This is used during gimplification and constexpr
+ or boolean_false_node. This is used during folding and constexpr
evaluation. */
tree
TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE (stmt) = 1;
break;
- case REQUIRES_EXPR:
- /* Emit the value of the requires-expression. */
- *stmt_p = evaluate_requires_expr (stmt);
- *walk_subtrees = 0;
- break;
-
case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR:
gcc_assert (concept_check_p (stmt));
/* Emit the value of the concept check. */
x = r;
break;
+ case REQUIRES_EXPR:
+ x = evaluate_requires_expr (x);
+ break;
+
default:
return org_x;
}
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/101182
+// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
+
+int a;
+void g(bool);
+
+bool f() {
+ g(requires { a++; });
+ return requires { a++; };
+}