spi: spi-ti-qspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408080931.2494356-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
index 081da1f..b5b65d8 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
@@ -172,9 +172,8 @@ static int ti_qspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
        dev_dbg(qspi->dev, "hz: %d, clock divider %d\n",
                        qspi->spi_max_frequency, clk_div);
 
-       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev);
+       ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(qspi->dev);
        if (ret < 0) {
-               pm_runtime_put_noidle(qspi->dev);
                dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
                return ret;
        }