We should disable irqs when we take the tu->qlock because it is used in
the irq handler. The only place that doesn't is
snd_timer_user_ccallback(). Most of the time snd_timer_user_ccallback()
is called with interrupts disabled but the the first ti->ccallback()
call in snd_timer_notify1() has interrupts enabled.
This was caught by lockdep which generates the following message:
> =================================
> [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> 2.6.34-rc5 #5
> ---------------------------------
> inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
> dolphin/4003 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
> (&(&tu->qlock)->rlock){?.+...}, at: [<
f84ec472>] snd_timer_user_tinterrupt+0x28/0x132 [snd_timer]
> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
> [<
c1048de9>] __lock_acquire+0x654/0x1482
> [<
c1049c73>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x73
> [<
c125ac3e>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x34
> [<
f84ec370>] snd_timer_user_ccallback+0x55/0x95 [snd_timer]
> [<
f84ecc4b>] snd_timer_notify1+0x53/0xca [snd_timer]
Reported-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
{
struct snd_timer_user *tu = timeri->callback_data;
struct snd_timer_tread r1;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (event >= SNDRV_TIMER_EVENT_START &&
event <= SNDRV_TIMER_EVENT_PAUSE)
r1.event = event;
r1.tstamp = *tstamp;
r1.val = resolution;
- spin_lock(&tu->qlock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tu->qlock, flags);
snd_timer_user_append_to_tqueue(tu, &r1);
- spin_unlock(&tu->qlock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tu->qlock, flags);
kill_fasync(&tu->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
wake_up(&tu->qchange_sleep);
}