bfd_size_type amt;
bfd_boolean is_branch;
struct elfNN_ia64_dyn_sym_info *dyn_i;
+ char symtype;
switch (r_type)
{
toff = isym->st_value;
dyn_i = get_dyn_sym_info (ia64_info, NULL, abfd, irel, FALSE);
+ symtype = ELF_ST_TYPE (isym->st_info);
}
else
{
tsec = h->root.u.def.section;
toff = h->root.u.def.value;
}
+
+ symtype = h->type;
}
if (tsec->sec_info_type == ELF_INFO_TYPE_MERGE)
- toff = _bfd_merged_section_offset (abfd, &tsec,
- elf_section_data (tsec)->sec_info,
- toff + irel->r_addend);
+ {
+ /* At this stage in linking, no SEC_MERGE symbol has been
+ adjusted, so all references to such symbols need to be
+ passed through _bfd_merged_section_offset. (Later, in
+ relocate_section, all SEC_MERGE symbols *except* for
+ section symbols have been adjusted.)
+
+ gas may reduce relocations against symbols in SEC_MERGE
+ sections to a relocation against the section symbol when
+ the original addend was zero. When the reloc is against
+ a section symbol we should include the addend in the
+ offset passed to _bfd_merged_section_offset, since the
+ location of interest is the original symbol. On the
+ other hand, an access to "sym+addend" where "sym" is not
+ a section symbol should not include the addend; Such an
+ access is presumed to be an offset from "sym"; The
+ location of interest is just "sym". */
+ if (symtype == STT_SECTION)
+ toff += irel->r_addend;
+
+ toff = _bfd_merged_section_offset (abfd, &tsec,
+ elf_section_data (tsec)->sec_info,
+ toff);
+
+ if (symtype != STT_SECTION)
+ toff += irel->r_addend;
+ }
else
toff += irel->r_addend;