Newer versions of CUDA no longer support sm_30, and nvptx-tools as
currently doesn't handle that gracefully when verifying
( https://github.com/MentorEmbedded/nvptx-tools/issues/30 ).
There's a --no-verify work-around in place in ASM_SPEC, but that one doesn't
work when using -Wa,--verify on the command line.
Use a more robust workaround: verify using sm_35 when misa=sm_30 is specified
(either implicitly or explicitly).
Tested on nvptx.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-03-30 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* config/nvptx/nvptx.h (ASM_SPEC): Use "-m sm_35" for -misa=sm_30.
#define STARTFILE_SPEC "%{mmainkernel:crt0.o}"
-/* Default needs to be in sync with default for misa in nvptx.opt.
- We add a default here to work around a hard-coded sm_30 default in
- nvptx-as. */
-#define ASM_SPEC "%{misa=*:-m %*; :-m sm_35}%{misa=sm_30:--no-verify}"
+/* Newer versions of CUDA no longer support sm_30, and nvptx-tools as
+ currently doesn't handle that gracefully when verifying
+ ( https://github.com/MentorEmbedded/nvptx-tools/issues/30 ). Work around
+ this by verifying with sm_35 when having misa=sm_30 (either implicitly
+ or explicitly). */
+#define ASM_SPEC \
+ "%{" \
+ /* Explict misa=sm_30. */ \
+ "misa=sm_30:-m sm_35" \
+ /* Separator. */ \
+ "; " \
+ /* Catch-all. */ \
+ "misa=*:-m %*" \
+ /* Separator. */ \
+ "; " \
+ /* Implicit misa=sm_30. */ \
+ ":-m sm_35" \
+ "}"
#define TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS() nvptx_cpu_cpp_builtins ()