i965: Make DCE explicitly not eliminate any control flow instructions.
authorKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 03:15:50 +0000 (19:15 -0800)
committerKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 05:44:29 +0000 (21:44 -0800)
According to Matt, the dead code pass explicitly avoided IF and WHILE
because on Sandybridge, these could have conditional modifiers and
null destination registers.  Normally, those instructions use BAD_FILE
for the destination register.  Nowadays, we don't do that anymore, so
we could technically drop these checks.

However, it's clearer to explicitly leave control flow instructions
alone, so change it to the more generic !inst->is_control_flow().

This should have no actual change.

[This patch implements review feedback from Curro and Matt.]

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_dead_code_eliminate.cpp

index 8a0469a..04901a9 100644 (file)
@@ -77,9 +77,8 @@ fs_visitor::dead_code_eliminate()
             }
          }
 
-         if ((inst->opcode != BRW_OPCODE_IF &&
-              inst->opcode != BRW_OPCODE_WHILE) &&
-             inst->dst.is_null() &&
+         if (inst->dst.is_null() &&
+             !inst->is_control_flow() &&
              !inst->has_side_effects() &&
              !inst->flags_written() &&
              !inst->writes_accumulator) {