This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
action in the middle of a rule.
+Actions in Mid-Rule
+
+* Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
+* Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
+* Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
+
Tracking Locations
* Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
+@menu
+* Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
+* Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
+* Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
+@end menu
+
+@node Using Mid-Rule Actions
+@subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
+
A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
@code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
it is run before they are parsed.
@code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
@code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
-parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
-@samp{stmt} is component number 6.
+parsed.
+
+Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
+component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
+and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
+
+@example
+@group
+stmt:
+ "let" '(' var ')'
+ @{
+ $<context>let = push_context ();
+ declare_variable ($3);
+ @}[let]
+ stmt
+ @{
+ $$ = $6;
+ pop_context ($<context>let);
+ @}
+@end group
+@end example
After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
let stmt
@{
$$ = $2;
- pop_context ($1);
+ pop_context ($let);
@};
let:
"let" '(' var ')'
@{
- $$ = push_context ();
+ $let = push_context ();
declare_variable ($3);
@};
Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
+@node Mid-Rule Action Translation
+@subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
+@vindex $@@@var{n}
+@vindex @@@var{n}
+
+As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
+rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
+graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
+reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
+following rule:
+
+@example
+exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+is translated into:
+
+@example
+$@@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
+$@@2: /* empty */ @{ c(); @};
+$@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
+exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
+
+A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
+the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
+action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
+
+@example
+exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+is translated into
+
+@example
+@@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
+@@2: /* empty */ @{ $$ = c(); @};
+$@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
+exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
+@end example
+
+There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
+action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
+final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
+final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
+@code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
+Bison}):
+
+@example
+$ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
+@group
+mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
+ exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
+ ^^^^^^^^
+@end group
+@group
+mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
+ exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
+ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+@end group
+@end example
+
+
+@node Mid-Rule Conflicts
+@subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
+
@node Tracking Locations
@section Tracking Locations
@cindex location
@end deffn
@deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
+@deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
+
+In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
+with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
@end deffn
@deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
@xref{Tracking Locations}.
@end deffn
+@deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
+In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
+with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
+@end deffn
+
@deffn {Variable} $$
In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
@xref{Actions}.