locking/rwsem: Remove RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:34:37 +0000 (09:34 +0100)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:10:57 +0000 (13:10 +0100)
Remove the now unused RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN hack. This hack breaks
PREEMPT_RT and getting rid of it was the entire motivation for
re-writing the percpu rwsem.

The biggest problem is that it is fundamentally incompatible with any
form of Priority Inheritance, any exclusively held lock must have a
distinct owner.

Requested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200204092228.GP14946@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
include/linux/rwsem.h
kernel/locking/rwsem.c

index 00d6054..8a418d9 100644 (file)
@@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
 #endif
 };
 
-/*
- * Setting all bits of the owner field except bit 0 will indicate
- * that the rwsem is writer-owned with an unknown owner.
- */
-#define RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN    (-2L)
-
 /* In all implementations count != 0 means locked */
 static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
index 81c0d75..e6f437b 100644 (file)
@@ -659,8 +659,6 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
        unsigned long flags;
        bool ret = true;
 
-       BUILD_BUG_ON(!(RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE));
-
        if (need_resched()) {
                lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_fail);
                return false;