} // namespace
-bool ASTWriter::isLookupResultExternal(StoredDeclsList &Result,
- DeclContext *DC) {
- return Result.hasExternalDecls() &&
- DC->hasNeedToReconcileExternalVisibleStorage();
-}
-
bool ASTWriter::isLookupResultEntirelyExternal(StoredDeclsList &Result,
DeclContext *DC) {
for (auto *D : Result.getLookupResult())
// order.
SmallVector<DeclarationName, 16> Names;
- // We also build up small sets of the constructor and conversion function
- // names which are visible.
- llvm::SmallPtrSet<DeclarationName, 8> ConstructorNameSet, ConversionNameSet;
-
- for (auto &Lookup : *DC->buildLookup()) {
- auto &Name = Lookup.first;
- auto &Result = Lookup.second;
+ // We also track whether we're writing out the DeclarationNameKey for
+ // constructors or conversion functions.
+ bool IncludeConstructorNames = false;
+ bool IncludeConversionNames = false;
+ for (auto &[Name, Result] : *DC->buildLookup()) {
// If there are no local declarations in our lookup result, we
// don't need to write an entry for the name at all. If we can't
// write out a lookup set without performing more deserialization,
// just skip this entry.
- if (isLookupResultExternal(Result, DC) &&
- isLookupResultEntirelyExternal(Result, DC))
+ if (isLookupResultEntirelyExternal(Result, DC))
continue;
// We also skip empty results. If any of the results could be external and
// results for them. This in almost certainly a bug in Clang's name lookup,
// but that is likely to be hard or impossible to fix and so we tolerate it
// here by omitting lookups with empty results.
- if (Lookup.second.getLookupResult().empty())
+ if (Result.getLookupResult().empty())
continue;
- switch (Lookup.first.getNameKind()) {
+ switch (Name.getNameKind()) {
default:
- Names.push_back(Lookup.first);
+ Names.push_back(Name);
break;
case DeclarationName::CXXConstructorName:
- assert(isa<CXXRecordDecl>(DC) &&
- "Cannot have a constructor name outside of a class!");
- ConstructorNameSet.insert(Name);
+ IncludeConstructorNames = true;
break;
case DeclarationName::CXXConversionFunctionName:
- assert(isa<CXXRecordDecl>(DC) &&
- "Cannot have a conversion function name outside of a class!");
- ConversionNameSet.insert(Name);
+ IncludeConversionNames = true;
break;
}
}
// Sort the names into a stable order.
llvm::sort(Names);
- if (auto *D = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC)) {
+ if (IncludeConstructorNames || IncludeConversionNames) {
// We need to establish an ordering of constructor and conversion function
- // names, and they don't have an intrinsic ordering.
-
- // First we try the easy case by forming the current context's constructor
- // name and adding that name first. This is a very useful optimization to
- // avoid walking the lexical declarations in many cases, and it also
- // handles the only case where a constructor name can come from some other
- // lexical context -- when that name is an implicit constructor merged from
- // another declaration in the redecl chain. Any non-implicit constructor or
- // conversion function which doesn't occur in all the lexical contexts
- // would be an ODR violation.
- auto ImplicitCtorName = Context->DeclarationNames.getCXXConstructorName(
- Context->getCanonicalType(Context->getRecordType(D)));
- if (ConstructorNameSet.erase(ImplicitCtorName))
- Names.push_back(ImplicitCtorName);
-
- // If we still have constructors or conversion functions, we walk all the
- // names in the decl and add the constructors and conversion functions
- // which are visible in the order they lexically occur within the context.
- if (!ConstructorNameSet.empty() || !ConversionNameSet.empty())
- for (Decl *ChildD : cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC)->decls())
- if (auto *ChildND = dyn_cast<NamedDecl>(ChildD)) {
- auto Name = ChildND->getDeclName();
- switch (Name.getNameKind()) {
- default:
- continue;
-
- case DeclarationName::CXXConstructorName:
- if (ConstructorNameSet.erase(Name))
- Names.push_back(Name);
- break;
+ // names, and they don't have an intrinsic ordering. We also need to write
+ // out all constructor and conversion function results if we write out any
+ // of them, because they're all tracked under the same lookup key.
+ llvm::SmallPtrSet<DeclarationName, 8> AddedNames;
+ for (Decl *ChildD : cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC)->decls()) {
+ if (auto *ChildND = dyn_cast<NamedDecl>(ChildD)) {
+ auto Name = ChildND->getDeclName();
+ switch (Name.getNameKind()) {
+ default:
+ continue;
- case DeclarationName::CXXConversionFunctionName:
- if (ConversionNameSet.erase(Name))
- Names.push_back(Name);
- break;
- }
+ case DeclarationName::CXXConstructorName:
+ if (!IncludeConstructorNames)
+ continue;
+ break;
- if (ConstructorNameSet.empty() && ConversionNameSet.empty())
- break;
+ case DeclarationName::CXXConversionFunctionName:
+ if (!IncludeConversionNames)
+ continue;
+ break;
}
-
- assert(ConstructorNameSet.empty() && "Failed to find all of the visible "
- "constructors by walking all the "
- "lexical members of the context.");
- assert(ConversionNameSet.empty() && "Failed to find all of the visible "
- "conversion functions by walking all "
- "the lexical members of the context.");
+ // We should include lookup results for this name.
+ if (AddedNames.insert(Name).second)
+ Names.push_back(Name);
+ }
+ }
}
// Next we need to do a lookup with each name into this decl context to fully