i965/fs: Simplify and improve accuracy of compute_to_mrf() by using regions_overlap().
authorFrancisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Fri, 27 May 2016 19:50:28 +0000 (12:50 -0700)
committerFrancisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Tue, 31 May 2016 22:56:54 +0000 (15:56 -0700)
Compute-to-mrf was being rather heavy-handed about checking whether
instruction source or destination regions interfere with the copy
instruction, which could conceivably lead to program miscompilation.
Fix it by using regions_overlap() instead of the open-coded and
dubiously correct overlap checks.

Cc: "12.0" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp

index d04eebc..172182a 100644 (file)
@@ -2792,19 +2792,6 @@ fs_visitor::compute_to_mrf()
           inst->src[0].subreg_offset)
         continue;
 
-      /* Work out which hardware MRF registers are written by this
-       * instruction.
-       */
-      int mrf_low = inst->dst.nr & ~BRW_MRF_COMPR4;
-      int mrf_high;
-      if (inst->dst.nr & BRW_MRF_COMPR4) {
-        mrf_high = mrf_low + 4;
-      } else if (inst->exec_size == 16) {
-        mrf_high = mrf_low + 1;
-      } else {
-        mrf_high = mrf_low;
-      }
-
       /* Can't compute-to-MRF this GRF if someone else was going to
        * read it later.
        */
@@ -2815,8 +2802,8 @@ fs_visitor::compute_to_mrf()
        * rewrite the thing that made this GRF to write into the MRF.
        */
       foreach_inst_in_block_reverse_starting_from(fs_inst, scan_inst, inst) {
-        if (scan_inst->dst.file == VGRF &&
-            scan_inst->dst.nr == inst->src[0].nr) {
+         if (regions_overlap(scan_inst->dst, scan_inst->regs_written * REG_SIZE,
+                             inst->src[0], inst->regs_read(0) * REG_SIZE)) {
            /* Found the last thing to write our reg we want to turn
             * into a compute-to-MRF.
             */
@@ -2872,53 +2859,32 @@ fs_visitor::compute_to_mrf()
          */
         bool interfered = false;
         for (int i = 0; i < scan_inst->sources; i++) {
-           if (scan_inst->src[i].file == VGRF &&
-                scan_inst->src[i].nr == inst->src[0].nr &&
-               scan_inst->src[i].reg_offset == inst->src[0].reg_offset) {
+            if (regions_overlap(scan_inst->src[i], scan_inst->regs_read(i) * REG_SIZE,
+                                inst->src[0], inst->regs_read(0) * REG_SIZE)) {
               interfered = true;
            }
         }
         if (interfered)
            break;
 
-        if (scan_inst->dst.file == MRF) {
+         if (regions_overlap(scan_inst->dst, scan_inst->regs_written * REG_SIZE,
+                             inst->dst, inst->regs_written * REG_SIZE)) {
            /* If somebody else writes our MRF here, we can't
             * compute-to-MRF before that.
             */
-            int scan_mrf_low = scan_inst->dst.nr & ~BRW_MRF_COMPR4;
-           int scan_mrf_high;
-
-            if (scan_inst->dst.nr & BRW_MRF_COMPR4) {
-              scan_mrf_high = scan_mrf_low + 4;
-           } else if (scan_inst->exec_size == 16) {
-              scan_mrf_high = scan_mrf_low + 1;
-           } else {
-              scan_mrf_high = scan_mrf_low;
-           }
-
-           if (mrf_low == scan_mrf_low ||
-               mrf_low == scan_mrf_high ||
-               mrf_high == scan_mrf_low ||
-               mrf_high == scan_mrf_high) {
-              break;
-           }
-        }
+            break;
+         }
 
-        if (scan_inst->mlen > 0 && scan_inst->base_mrf != -1) {
+         if (scan_inst->mlen > 0 && scan_inst->base_mrf != -1 &&
+             regions_overlap(fs_reg(MRF, scan_inst->base_mrf), scan_inst->mlen * REG_SIZE,
+                             inst->dst, inst->regs_written * REG_SIZE)) {
            /* Found a SEND instruction, which means that there are
             * live values in MRFs from base_mrf to base_mrf +
             * scan_inst->mlen - 1.  Don't go pushing our MRF write up
             * above it.
             */
-           if (mrf_low >= scan_inst->base_mrf &&
-               mrf_low < scan_inst->base_mrf + scan_inst->mlen) {
-              break;
-           }
-           if (mrf_high >= scan_inst->base_mrf &&
-               mrf_high < scan_inst->base_mrf + scan_inst->mlen) {
-              break;
-           }
-        }
+            break;
+         }
       }
    }