commit
7e1d90f60a0d501c8503e636942ca704a454d910 upstream.
commit
4842e98f26dd80be3623c4714a244ba52ea096a8 ("ALSA: seq: Fix race at
creating a queue") attempted to fix a race reported by syzkaller. That
fix has been described as follows:
"
When a sequencer queue is created in snd_seq_queue_alloc(),it adds the
new queue element to the public list before referencing it. Thus the
queue might be deleted before the call of snd_seq_queue_use(), and it
results in the use-after-free error, as spotted by syzkaller.
The fix is to reference the queue object at the right time.
"
Even with that fix in place, syzkaller reported a use-after-free error.
It specifically pointed to the last instruction "return q->queue" in
snd_seq_queue_alloc(). The pointer q is being used after kfree() has
been called on it.
It turned out that there is still a small window where a race can
happen. The window opens at
snd_seq_ioctl_create_queue()->snd_seq_queue_alloc()->queue_list_add()
and closes at
snd_seq_ioctl_create_queue()->queueptr()->snd_use_lock_use(). Between
these two calls, a different thread could delete the queue and possibly
re-create a different queue in the same location in queue_list.
This change prevents this situation by calling snd_use_lock_use() from
snd_seq_queue_alloc() prior to calling queue_list_add(). It is then the
caller's responsibility to call snd_use_lock_free(&q->use_lock).
Fixes:
4842e98f26dd ("ALSA: seq: Fix race at creating a queue")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
static int snd_seq_ioctl_create_queue(struct snd_seq_client *client, void *arg)
{
struct snd_seq_queue_info *info = arg;
- int result;
struct snd_seq_queue *q;
- result = snd_seq_queue_alloc(client->number, info->locked, info->flags);
- if (result < 0)
- return result;
-
- q = queueptr(result);
- if (q == NULL)
- return -EINVAL;
+ q = snd_seq_queue_alloc(client->number, info->locked, info->flags);
+ if (IS_ERR(q))
+ return PTR_ERR(q);
info->queue = q->queue;
info->locked = q->locked;
if (!info->name[0])
snprintf(info->name, sizeof(info->name), "Queue-%d", q->queue);
strlcpy(q->name, info->name, sizeof(q->name));
- queuefree(q);
+ snd_use_lock_free(&q->use_lock);
return 0;
}
static void queue_use(struct snd_seq_queue *queue, int client, int use);
/* allocate a new queue -
- * return queue index value or negative value for error
+ * return pointer to new queue or ERR_PTR(-errno) for error
+ * The new queue's use_lock is set to 1. It is the caller's responsibility to
+ * call snd_use_lock_free(&q->use_lock).
*/
-int snd_seq_queue_alloc(int client, int locked, unsigned int info_flags)
+struct snd_seq_queue *snd_seq_queue_alloc(int client, int locked, unsigned int info_flags)
{
struct snd_seq_queue *q;
q = queue_new(client, locked);
if (q == NULL)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
q->info_flags = info_flags;
queue_use(q, client, 1);
+ snd_use_lock_use(&q->use_lock);
if (queue_list_add(q) < 0) {
+ snd_use_lock_free(&q->use_lock);
queue_delete(q);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
- return q->queue;
+ return q;
}
/* delete a queue - queue must be owned by the client */
/* create new queue (constructor) */
-int snd_seq_queue_alloc(int client, int locked, unsigned int flags);
+struct snd_seq_queue *snd_seq_queue_alloc(int client, int locked, unsigned int flags);
/* delete queue (destructor) */
int snd_seq_queue_delete(int client, int queueid);