ext4: fix online resizing for bigalloc file systems with a 1k block size
authorTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tue, 4 Sep 2018 02:25:01 +0000 (22:25 -0400)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:06:06 +0000 (03:06 -0700)
commit 5f8c10936fab2b69a487400f2872902e597dd320 upstream.

An online resize of a file system with the bigalloc feature enabled
and a 1k block size would be refused since ext4_resize_begin() did not
understand s_first_data_block is 0 for all bigalloc file systems, even
when the block size is 1k.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fs/ext4/resize.c

index 41fb037..e344e60 100644 (file)
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 
 int ext4_resize_begin(struct super_block *sb)
 {
+       struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
        int ret = 0;
 
        if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@ int ext4_resize_begin(struct super_block *sb)
          * because the user tools have no way of handling this.  Probably a
          * bad time to do it anyways.
          */
-       if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh->b_blocknr !=
+       if (EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_sbh->b_blocknr) !=
            le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_data_block)) {
                ext4_warning(sb, "won't resize using backup superblock at %llu",
                        (unsigned long long)EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh->b_blocknr);