tracing/kprobes: Fix the order of argument descriptions
authorYujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Tue, 31 Oct 2023 04:13:05 +0000 (12:13 +0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:52:18 +0000 (11:52 +0100)
[ Upstream commit f032c53bea6d2057c14553832d846be2f151cfb2 ]

The order of descriptions should be consistent with the argument list of
the function, so "kretprobe" should be the second one.

int __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(struct dynevent_cmd *cmd, bool kretprobe,
                                 const char *name, const char *loc, ...)

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231031041305.3363712-1-yujie.liu@intel.com/
Fixes: 2a588dd1d5d6 ("tracing: Add kprobe event command generation functions")
Suggested-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c

index 56675294d7a3b148cea3d9ca91d90d614c177770..a34a4fcdab7b1b70d8fc924c875be786448e1c69 100644 (file)
@@ -986,9 +986,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kprobe_event_cmd_init);
 /**
  * __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start - Generate a kprobe event command from arg list
  * @cmd: A pointer to the dynevent_cmd struct representing the new event
+ * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe?
  * @name: The name of the kprobe event
  * @loc: The location of the kprobe event
- * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe?
  * @...: Variable number of arg (pairs), one pair for each field
  *
  * NOTE: Users normally won't want to call this function directly, but