It's wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice
authorXiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Fri, 8 Mar 2019 15:52:05 +0000 (23:52 +0800)
committerSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:15:18 +0000 (10:15 -0700)
In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to
sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk
at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data
corruption.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
drivers/md/raid10.c

index abb5d38..ecef42b 100644 (file)
@@ -4670,7 +4670,6 @@ read_more:
        atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining);
        read_bio->bi_next = NULL;
        generic_make_request(read_bio);
-       sector_nr += nr_sectors;
        sectors_done += nr_sectors;
        if (sector_nr <= last)
                goto read_more;