[clang-tidy] Yet another docs fixes

llvm-svn: 296888

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst
index 3420bf2..e6beddd 100644 (file)
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ exception safe. In this case the calls of ``push_back`` won't be replaced.
 
 This is because replacing it with ``emplace_back`` could cause a leak of this
 pointer if ``emplace_back`` would throw exception before emplacement (e.g. not
-enough memory to add new element).
+enough memory to add a new element).
 
 For more info read item 42 - "Consider emplacement instead of insertion." of
 Scott Meyers "Effective Modern C++".
@@ -79,14 +79,15 @@ The default smart pointers that are considered are ``std::unique_ptr``,
 other classes use the :option:`SmartPointers` option.
 
 
-Check also fires if any argument of constructor call would be:
+Check also doesn't fire if any argument of the constructor call would be:
 
-  - bitfield (bitfields can't bind to rvalue/universal reference)
+  - a bit-field (bit-fields can't bind to rvalue/universal reference)
 
-  - ``new`` expression (to avoid leak) or if the argument would be converted via
-    derived-to-base cast.
+  - a ``new`` expression (to avoid leak)
 
-This check requires C++11 of higher to run.
+  - if the argument would be converted via derived-to-base cast.
+
+This check requires C++11 or higher to run.
 
 Options
 -------