TIF_NOHZ is 19 (i.e. _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME |
_TIF_SINGLESTEP), not (1<<19).
This code is involved in Dave's trinity lockup, but I don't see why
it would cause any of the problems he's seeing, except inadvertently
by causing a different path through entry_64.S's syscall handling.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a6cd3b60a3f53afb6e1c8081b0ec30ff19003dd7.1416434075.git.luto@amacapital.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
*/
if (work & _TIF_NOHZ) {
user_exit();
- work &= ~TIF_NOHZ;
+ work &= ~_TIF_NOHZ;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP