2013-01-31 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
+ David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
+
+ PR ld/15056
+ * elfxx-sparc.c (_bfd_sparc_elf_gc_mark_hook): Handle implicit
+ references to __tls_get_addr.
+ * elf32-tilpro.c (tilepro_elf_gc_mark_hook): Likewise. Correct
+ vtinherit and vtentry reloc handling too.
+ * elfxx-tilegx.c (tilegx_elf_gc_mark_hook): As for tilepro.
+
+2013-01-31 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc_stub_name): Trim off trailing "+0".
if (h != NULL)
{
switch (ELF32_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
- {
- case R_TILEPRO_GNU_VTINHERIT:
- case R_TILEPRO_GNU_VTENTRY:
- break;
- }
+ {
+ case R_TILEPRO_GNU_VTINHERIT:
+ case R_TILEPRO_GNU_VTENTRY:
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* FIXME: The test here, in check_relocs and in relocate_section
+ dealing with TLS optimization, ought to be !info->executable. */
+ if (info->shared)
+ {
+ switch (ELF32_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
+ {
+ case R_TILEPRO_TLS_GD_CALL:
+ /* This reloc implicitly references __tls_get_addr. We know
+ another reloc will reference the same symbol as the one
+ on this reloc, so the real symbol and section will be
+ gc marked when processing the other reloc. That lets
+ us handle __tls_get_addr here. */
+ h = elf_link_hash_lookup (elf_hash_table (info), "__tls_get_addr",
+ FALSE, FALSE, TRUE);
+ BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL);
+ h->mark = 1;
+ if (h->u.weakdef != NULL)
+ h->u.weakdef->mark = 1;
+ sym = NULL;
+ }
}
return _bfd_elf_gc_mark_hook (sec, info, rel, h, sym);
return NULL;
}
+ /* FIXME: The test here, in check_relocs and in relocate_section
+ dealing with TLS optimization, ought to be !info->executable. */
+ if (info->shared)
+ {
+ switch (SPARC_ELF_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
+ {
+ case R_SPARC_TLS_GD_CALL:
+ case R_SPARC_TLS_LDM_CALL:
+ /* This reloc implicitly references __tls_get_addr. We know
+ another reloc will reference the same symbol as the one
+ on this reloc, so the real symbol and section will be
+ gc marked when processing the other reloc. That lets
+ us handle __tls_get_addr here. */
+ h = elf_link_hash_lookup (elf_hash_table (info), "__tls_get_addr",
+ FALSE, FALSE, TRUE);
+ BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL);
+ h->mark = 1;
+ if (h->u.weakdef != NULL)
+ h->u.weakdef->mark = 1;
+ sym = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
return _bfd_elf_gc_mark_hook (sec, info, rel, h, sym);
}
if (h != NULL)
{
switch (TILEGX_ELF_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
- {
- case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTINHERIT:
- case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTENTRY:
- break;
- }
+ {
+ case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTINHERIT:
+ case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTENTRY:
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* FIXME: The test here, in check_relocs and in relocate_section
+ dealing with TLS optimization, ought to be !info->executable. */
+ if (info->shared)
+ {
+ switch (TILEGX_ELF_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
+ {
+ case R_TILEGX_TLS_GD_CALL:
+ /* This reloc implicitly references __tls_get_addr. We know
+ another reloc will reference the same symbol as the one
+ on this reloc, so the real symbol and section will be
+ gc marked when processing the other reloc. That lets
+ us handle __tls_get_addr here. */
+ h = elf_link_hash_lookup (elf_hash_table (info), "__tls_get_addr",
+ FALSE, FALSE, TRUE);
+ BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL);
+ h->mark = 1;
+ if (h->u.weakdef != NULL)
+ h->u.weakdef->mark = 1;
+ sym = NULL;
+ }
}
return _bfd_elf_gc_mark_hook (sec, info, rel, h, sym);