Eliminate another set-but-unused xx warning
authorPanu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:02:23 +0000 (10:02 +0300)
committerPanu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:02:23 +0000 (10:02 +0300)
- There's no meaningful way to return error from rpmdbExtendIterator()
  in rpmFindBaseNamesInDB() so dont bother collecting the result.
  At least there'll be rpmlog spew on errors so it wouldn't be
  silently failing.

lib/transaction.c

index 5abfab7..3fd0279 100644 (file)
@@ -857,7 +857,6 @@ rpmdbMatchIterator rpmFindBaseNamesInDB(rpmts ts, uint64_t fileCount)
     rpmtsi pi;  rpmte p;
     rpmfi fi;
     rpmdbMatchIterator mi;
-    int xx;
     int oc = 0;
     const char * baseName;
 
@@ -883,7 +882,7 @@ rpmdbMatchIterator rpmFindBaseNamesInDB(rpmts ts, uint64_t fileCount)
            keylen = strlen(baseName);
            if (keylen == 0)
                keylen++;       /* XXX "/" fixup. */
-           xx = rpmdbExtendIterator(mi, baseName, keylen);
+           rpmdbExtendIterator(mi, baseName, keylen);
            rpmStringSetAddEntry(baseNames, baseName);
         }
     }