server and ses->server are the same, but it's a little bit ugly that we
lock &ses->server->srv_mutex and unlock &server->srv_mutex. It causes
a false positive in Smatch about inconsistent locking.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
if (rc) {
cifs_dbg(VFS, "Send error in SessSetup = %d\n", rc);
} else {
- mutex_lock(&ses->server->srv_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
if (!server->session_estab) {
server->session_key.response = ses->auth_key.response;
server->session_key.len = ses->auth_key.len;